Reg D 506(c) · Accredited Investors Only · Confidential
Fund I · $4,000,000

Same property. Same mortgage. 68% more revenue.

A 6-bedroom home in our target markets loses $1,600/month leased as a whole house. Rented room-by-room at $550 per key, the same asset cash-flows $500+/month after debt service. This structural inefficiency exists across dozens of secondary U.S. markets because no one has built a professional, scalable platform to exploit it — until now.

4
Properties Operating
22
Rooms Leased
$19,552
Monthly Cash Flow
88%
Average Occupancy
The Thesis

The math is the moat.

Home prices and rents have outpaced wages for a decade. Remote workers, tradespeople, and recent graduates cannot justify $1,500+/month for a one-bedroom. At $550–650 per room with private locks and responsive management, we are the premium shared housing option — not the last-resort one.

Whole-house lease
$2,200/mo
One tenant. One lease. After mortgage and costs → $1,600/month loss on a typical $200K asset at today's rates.
Room-by-room
$3,300/mo gross
Six rooms at $550 each. Same property. Same mortgage. $500+/month net after debt service and operating costs.
The delta
+68%
Gross revenue lift. Five to six leases per property means one vacancy is one-sixth of income at risk — not zero income.
The Problem

Traditional single-family rentals don't cash-flow at today's rates.

Two identical homes. Two operating models. The difference between capital destruction and compounding returns.

Traditional SFR

Whole-house lease to a single tenant.
Result
Thin or negative margins.

At 7–8% rates, single-tenant rents don't cover mortgage plus expenses on $150–250K homes in our target markets. One lease equals one point of failure.

Room-by-Room

Individual room leases to working professionals.
Result
50%+ more gross revenue.

14–30% cash-on-cash returns. Break-even at 65.5% occupancy. $550 per room — half the rent of a one-bedroom apartment in the same city.

Operating Proof

The model is already running.

Three years. Four properties. Twenty-two rooms. Every system built from experience — not from a spreadsheet.

2022
First property acquired in Centennial, CO. First tenants placed. Playbook begins.
2023
Second property in Englewood, CO. Tenant qualification model refined.
2025
Properties three and four come online. Portfolio-level systems built.
2026
SOPs documented. Fund structure designed. Ready to replicate.
Why Others Failed

100% failure rate for master-lease, coastal, and development models.

Every venture-backed competitor in shared housing shut down. We studied each one, identified the fatal flaw, and built around it: we own the asset, we target mid-market suburban, and we acquire — we do not develop or master-lease.

Company Model Failure Mode Outcome
CommonMaster lease, urbanHigh overhead, lease liabilityShut down
QuartersMaster lease, urbanLease exposure, thin marginsShut down
StarcityDevelopment, luxuryCapital intensity, slow scaleShut down
The CollectiveDevelopment, luxuryMassive cost overrunsShut down
HubHausMaster lease, SFH30% COVID vacancyShut down
PadSplitMarketplace (no RE risk)Surviving
This Platform Own assets · mid-market suburban Acquisition-only · no master lease Operating · cash-flowing
Target Markets

Where yields live.

Four-phase screening: financial modeling → social demand → legal and risk review → boots-on-the-ground validation. Denver isn't even in our top markets — it's just where we proved the model.

Davenport, IA

30%+
Cash-on-cash · Avg purchase $180–220K

Youngstown, OH

30%
Cash-on-cash · Avg purchase $120–180K

Indianapolis, IN

30%
Cash-on-cash · Avg purchase $180–250K

Toledo, OH

25%
Cash-on-cash · Avg purchase $130–200K

Dayton, OH

18%
Cash-on-cash · Avg purchase $150–220K

Huntington, WV

18%
Cash-on-cash · Avg purchase $120–180K

Purchase prices $500K+ below Denver with comparable room-rent demand.

Fund I · $4,000,000

Deploy across three validated markets. Prove replicability outside Denver.

Fund I is a proof-of-concept raise, sized to acquire 75+ properties, prove the city-manager model works beyond our operating geography, and set up Fund II at 3× the scale.

75+
Properties acquired
450+
Rooms at full deployment
~$3M
Annual gross revenue
~$450K
Net operating income
1.25×
Preferred return coverage (9%)
12 mo
To full deployment
Use of Funds

Every dollar has a job.

Capital flows into real estate — not overhead. Over 75% goes directly into down payments on cash-flowing assets.

$4M FUND I
75–80%
Property Acquisition
~$40–43K per property at 25% down. Direct into cash-flowing assets.
8–10%
Reserves — Vacancy + CapEx
6+ months of debt service coverage held at the fund level.
5–7%
Operating Infrastructure
Systems, legal, and SPV entity setup for each property.
3–4%
City Manager Onboarding
Recruiting, training, and 90-day ramp in each new market.
2–3%
Working Capital Buffer
Loan costs and initial housing setup per property.
Investor Returns

LPs get paid first. GPs get paid if it works.

9% preferred return, cumulative. Full capital returned before the GP earns a cent of profit share. Tiered carry above the hurdle aligns our incentives with performance — the better the fund does, the more aggressively we share in it, and the more aggressively you do too.

1
Return of Capital
100% to LP
Full invested capital returned before any profit is distributed.
2
9% Preferred Return
100% to LP
Cumulative. The GP earns nothing until this is paid.
3
GP Catch-Up
100% to GP
Until the GP has caught up to 20% of total profits distributed.
4
Tiered Residual Carry
LP / GP split
Remaining profits split on the performance tier below.
Return TierLP SplitGP Split
0–9% (Below Hurdle)100%0%
9–12% (Base Carry)80%20%
12–18% (Strong)65%35%
18%+ (Exceptional)50%50%
Three-Year Growth Path

Fund I proves the model. Funds II and III scale it.

A $12.5–25M+ exit target at platform maturity. Fund I is the wedge — a deliberately constrained raise sized to prove replicability across three markets without over-committing LP capital before the city-manager model is validated at scale.

Fund I $4M
Properties75+
Rooms450+
Markets3
Revenue~$3M
NOI~$450K
Fund II $12M
Properties300+
Rooms1,650+
Markets6–9
Revenue$10M+
NOI$1.5M+
Fund III $12M
Properties600+
Rooms3,300+
Markets20+
Revenue$20M+
NOI$3M+
Management Team

Engineers who operate. Investors who build.

Three principals. Operating experience running the exact model Fund I will scale. A governance structure designed around risk isolation, not founder convenience.

Gareth Svanda Chief Executive Officer

Strategy, acquisitions, underwriting. Mechanical engineer (Colorado School of Mines) with a Colorado real estate license and a background in oil and gas operations and sales. Three years operating room-by-room properties.

OpCo 43.5% · GP 45%
Trevor Sharon Chief Operating Officer

Operations, systems, city managers. M.S. Mechanical Engineering (Colorado School of Mines), Colorado real estate license, aerospace manufacturing and operations background. Built every operational SOP and the tenant qualification model.

OpCo 43.5% · GP 45%
Dr. Robert Whetsel Founding Partner

Investor relations, capital partners, fund positioning. PhD Computer Science, Executive MBA (MIT). 40 years of federal executive leadership, including service as Chief Data Scientist at USCYBERCOM and Associate Director at the FDA.

OpCo 10% · GP 10%
GP entity controls fund decisions | OpCo employs city managers & earns 8% management fee | Property SPVs isolate risk per asset
The Ask

Four million dollars. Seventy-five properties. One year to full deployment.

We're speaking with a limited number of accredited investors before the Fund I allocation closes. Request the full deck and the property-level financial model.